You're currently viewing an old version of this dataset. To see the current version, click here.
Habitat loss and interspecific competition shape coral reef ecosystem processes
Dataset extent
Data and Resources
Additional Info
Field | Value |
---|---|
Author | Dr. John Valentine or Nathan Lemoine |
Maintainer | data@disl.org |
Last Updated | July 23, 2022, 03:05 (UTC) |
Created | July 23, 2022, 03:04 (UTC) |
Access_Constraints | Permission to access these data must be given by Dr. John Valentine or Nathan Lemoine of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab. |
ISO 19115 Topic Categories | biota, 002, environment, 007, oceans, 014 |
Place Keywords | Florida, United States of America, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, Grecian Rocks, North Dry Rocks, Horseshoe Reef, Dauphin Island Sea Lab |
Theme Keywords | habitat loss, coral, reefs, ecosystem, competition, fish, fish assemblages, coral mortality, degradation, trophic interactions, richness, abundance, grazing, predation, herbivory, artificial coral, damselfish |
Use_Constraints | Acknowledgment of the DISL: Valentine Lab and the NOAA/UNC Wilmington Coral Reef Conservation grant would be appreciated in products developed from these data, and such acknowledgment as is standard for citation and legal practices for data source is expected by users of these data. Users should be aware that comparison with other data sets for the same area from other time periods may be inaccurate due to inconsistencies resulting from changes in mapping conventions, data collection, and computer processes over time. The distributor shall not be liable for improper or incorrect use of these data, based on the description of appropriate/inappropriate uses described in the metadata document. These data are not legal documents and are not to be used as such. |
dc.coverage.placeName | Florida United States of America Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Grecian Rocks North Dry Rocks Horseshoe Reef Dauphin Island Sea Lab |
dc.coverage.t.max | 200908T |
dc.coverage.t.min | 200806T |
dc.coverage.x.max | -80.2858 |
dc.coverage.x.min | -80.3051 |
dc.coverage.y.max | 25.1244 |
dc.coverage.y.min | 25.1123 |
dc.creator | Dauphin Island Sea Lab: Valentine Lab |
dc.date | Unpublished material |
dc.description | Despite contrasting views on the impacts of loss of live coral cover and habitat complexity on reef fishes, experimental studies designed to assess the relative impacts of these two factors have not been conducted (Pratchett et al., 2008). Lirman (1999) used a mensurative experiment to analyze the impacts of coral mortality and structural degradation, via comparisons of reef fish assemblages on live and dead A. palmata colonies. His results suggest that loss of structure provided by A. palmata plays a more important role than loss of living tissue in determining fish assemblage composition, although the distribution of a number of specialists was related to the presence of live coral tissue. However, mensurative experiments are prone to confounding factors and can only correlate measurements. The lack of manipulative experiments has inhibited researchers from properly assessing relative importance of live coral cover and structural complexity. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine how coral biodiversity loss affects coral reef ecosystem processes, using a series of manipulative and mensurative experiments designed to answer three specific questions: 1) How does coral biodiversity loss affect habitat availability? Since the densities of multiple coral species have simultaneously declined (Green et al., 2008), and the impacts of such cumulative losses on habitat complexity are uncertain, the first experiment quantitatively assesses the impacts of coral species richness and identity on reef rugosity using both mensurative and manipulative methods. I also investigated the impacts of coral biodiversity loss on several fish community metrics, including species richness and overall abundance, in order to assess the appropriate measure of habitat quality for coral reef fishes. 2) How does loss of live coral and structure influence fish assemblages? I used mensurative survey techniques and experimental manipulations to determine the individual effects of both live coral loss and three-dimensional structure on reef fish assemblages. Experimental plots were created using artificial A. palmata mimics to reconstruct exact reef shapes, as opposed to cinder blocks, which are proven to be ecologically irrelevant approximations of rugosity (Kroutil, 2005). 3) What are the responses, and the causal mechanisms, of trophic interactions to habitat loss? To determine how ecosystem processes, i.e. grazing and predation, are affected by habitat loss, and the spatial extent to which trophic interactions have been affected, processes were measured in `Complex' A. palmata stands, simple sites adjacent to (`Near') and removed from (`Far') structurally complex sites , and within experimentally recreated `Current' habitats using established tethering techniques (Valentine et al., 2007, 2008; Eklof et al., 2009). The `Current' sites were constructed to mimic the current state of isolated, non-living A. palmata skeletons that currently characterize Caribbean reefs. |
dc.language | en |
dc.subject | habitat loss coral reefs ecosystem competition fish fish assemblages coral mortality degradation trophic interactions richness abundance grazing predation herbivory artificial coral damselfish |
dc.title | Habitat loss and interspecific competition shape coral reef ecosystem processes |
dc.type | spreadsheet |
spatial | { "type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [ [ [ -80.3051, 25.1244 ], [ -80.2858, 25.1244 ], [ -80.2858, 25.1123 ], [ -80.3051, 25.1123 ], [ -80.3051, 25.1244 ] ] ] } |